Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Lumley Castle Hotel
Sponsored by
Chester-le-Street, www.lumleycastle.com

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Questions answered regarding asbestos



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 October 2008
R BEDDOW (Mail, September 30) rightly pointed out that many people have suffered as a result of being exposed to asbestos fibres in the past.
That is a tragedy for those affected and it happened because in the past proper precautions were not taken by the employers to safeguard the health of their employees.

S Booth (Mail, October 1), then said, in relation to Seaton Meadows, that "asb
estos was not covered or dampened to prevent fibres being released into the air".

That happened a few years ago and the Environment Agency said that "heavy machinery used to crush the asbestos could have released dangerous fibres into the air".

In other words no fibres were actually released. That is why I said in a previous letter there was no evidence of danger to anyone from asbestos fibres. However, Able UK had to pay a fine of £22,000 because of an unforeseeable machinery breakdown and human error.

The situation is different today. Able UK have been given permission to remove asbestos from ships and other marine structures on condition that the work is done without endangering the health of the workforce or the general public.

There are detailed codes of practice dealing with the removal and disposal of asbestos, and engineers from the Environment Agency and the Health and Safety Executive have the job of making sure that the work is done in accordance with detailed Government regulations.

Able UK employs a firm of asbestos removal specialists to ensure that the work is done safely and, in addition to that, the council has appointed another firm of asbestos specialists, Scott Wilson Ltd, to make doubly sure that safe working practices are implemented.

Finally the High Court recently refused to approve an application for a Judicial Review into Able UKs intention to dismantle the Clemenceau at Graythorp.

The Court saw no reason to prevent Able from carrying out their contract with the French. So the work will now go ahead.

The health of the workforce and the public will clearly be fully protected during the ship dismantling activities.

Jim Allan,
Hartlepool.



The full article contains 353 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 October 2008 9:36 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hartlepool
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.